In the room and not

       No one was in the room, but progress was made.

       My bill to protect the instructional, creative, or scholarly work product of professors was first on the list for the Government Operations subcommittee.

       Before it was taken up, however, there was a request to leave the room from the lobbyist for the University System of Maryland, my chief of staff, counsel for the Washington Post, and a lawyer for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

       Email does wonders, but this face-to-face meeting resulted in a better understanding of what I was trying to accomplish than the many messages that had preceded it.

      No agreement yet, but we’re now discussing a revised amendment online, instead of a request for summer study.

      My legislation to require businesses to make their websites accessible for the blind was also introduced in the State Senate.

      The Senate sponsor is a member of the committee that will vote on the bill.   I am not.

       I discussed the legislation with the lawyer who asked me to introduce it.

       “Let’s try to move the Senate bill first,” I suggested. “The sponsor will be in the room when decisions are made.”

        If the Senate bill gets favorable action, the same is also likely for mine.

Fixing a problem

            “Is there a problem that needs to be fixed?” 

            That’s another way of saying, “Why do we need this bill?”

             Registered nurses, physician assistants, and licensed clinical social workers could provide health care to minors without the consent of their parents or guardians under my House Bill 68

            A physician, psychologist, or individual operating under the direction of one of those practitioners can already do so. 

            My legislation does not change the circumstances where such care is permitted.  You would not know that from the objections that certain interest groups are raising.  They want to use my bill to change the existing policy.

            I will emphasize that in my written and oral testimony at tomorrow’s bill hearing.

             Is a professor’s research on medical, scientific, technical, or scholarly issues already exempt from a request under the Public Information Act?  Is that also the case for documents dealing with public policy issues?

             I introduced House Bill 62 after learning of incidents where professors were intellectually harassed in Wisconsin and Virginia.  Are the laws there as protective of academic research as Maryland’s already is?

             I need to know the answer before Thursday – when the bill will be heard.

Drawing maps and striking the right balance

                The most important legislation I worked on this past summer won’t have my name on it. 

                 The Governor introduces the resolution redrawing the boundaries for our legislative districts. 

                 If you can’t be elected in your new district, you can’t pass any bills. 

                 So my 41st District colleagues and I met early and often.  We proposed a map that looked very much like our existing district – geographically and demographically. 

                 The 41st District in the Governor’s plan meets both of those criteria. 

                We lose none of our current neighborhoods and add Roland Park below Cold Spring Lane, Sinai Hospital and its adjacent residential communities, and the Uplands redevelopment along the Edmondson Avenue corridor.

 —–  

                This morning, I introduced the first bill this session that will have my name on it.

                 House Bill 62 would exempt a professor’s research from a Public Information Act request. 

                  Translation: Someone who disagrees with a professor who took a stand on a public issue could not harass the academic by demanding a copy of his or her research. 

                  This is not hypothetical.  It happened during Wisconsin’s battle over union rights and government spending last year and a controversy over climate control research by a former faculty member at the University of Virginia. 

                   For HB 62 to pass, I must demonstrate that it strikes the right balance between the public’s right to know and academic freedom.

  • My Key Issues:

  • Pimlico and The Preakness
  • Our Neighborhoods
  • Pre-Kindergarten
  • Lead Paint Poisoning